Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BluejackQ (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bluejacking. Randykitty (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BluejackQ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on self-published sources, no evidence of independent, reliable sources giving significant coverage, therefore failing NWEB and GNG. Ineligible for PROD as previously AFD'd. Twice. SITH (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft delete since there were two previous AFDs.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^merge to bluejacking: I found several reliable-enough references to the site including some academic papers, but there doesn't seem to be enough to justify a separate article. Mangoe (talk) 21:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.