Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluecanvas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bluecanvas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally tagged as speedy G11, but the article has been cleaned up. However, the notability of this magazine in questionable at best. There are several references used in the article; however only two of them would qualify as reliable: one is behind a paywall, and the other talks about the magazine's founder, but not about the magazine itself. Fails WP:NMEDIA. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:27, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currently working on gathering better reliable sources about the magazine itself and cleaning up the article. Thank you for your input and help. I really appreciated it. Lexoman (talk) 22:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Perhaps it is best to wait before a blanket deletion, per user Lexoman's statement above about expanding and cleaning up the article. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's been several days, and there shouldn't be an article if it's not ready. If (Wikipedia:SPA) Lexoman is still going to work on it, he should do it in his sandbox like he's been doing. JFHJr (㊟) 08:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC) P.S. He can always recreate the page when it's viable, after all... JFHJr (㊟) 08:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.