Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blub (programming)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Paul Graham. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 15:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blub (programming) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not important or notable, sufficiently covered by Paul Graham page. Zeppomedio (talk) 01:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm no computer programmer, but shouldn't articles make some since to people that have lesser knowledge of the subject? I can't make heads or tails of this. Also non notable. RockManQ (talk) 01:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge and redirect perhaps a sentence to Paul Graham. Just because a notable person proposes a hypothetical computer language to make a point doesn't make that language worthy of an article. Still, it may receive references in programming and CS texts so makes sense to have around for search and index/list purposes. --Dhartung | Talk 07:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect. Not sufficiently notable to have own article, and unlikely to ever progress past stub.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 13:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. WikiScrubber (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to Paul Graham. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.