Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlogRex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speeedy delete G5. (non-admin closure) Savonneux (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BlogRex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB WP:CORP. The actual website has almost no content and the huffington post citation is fake. This is just self promotion. Savonneux (talk) 05:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fake claims and nothing on google to show notability. Domain is owned by someone other than the person named in the article. noq (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. Fake citations, removing AFD tags, editor knows what he's doing as well. FelisLeo^Talk! 21:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up nothing useable. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems he is advocating using Wikipedia to improve SEO. [1] - number 29. noq (talk) 16:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.