Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockwash
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Blockwash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable Mccapra (talk) 08:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 08:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 11:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment' This technique is a form of resist painting, perhaps it can redirect there if it is ever adopted by more artist than the inventor. Vexations (talk) 11:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:NEO. Appears to be a term used only by one artist. But wait, it is in common use to refer to a product to clean your LEGO, and also as a technique in blockchain cryptocurrency.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete my searches fail to find this term in use.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.