Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birdie Try

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Soft deletion equivalent to an uncontested PROD. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birdie Try

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Not notable. Rathfelder (talk) 18:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of WP:BEFORE check was used to determine this article's notability? Given the game's age, online sources are unlikely to have covered the game, so I very much doubt that an online-only search, looking for reliable sourcing covering the topic in-depth, is sufficient to meet WP:BEFORE. --Izno (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.