Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Comic Book DataBase (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Big Comic Book DataBase

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent coverage, unsourced and tagged for notability 3+ years. Previously kept way back in the VFD days of 2004. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — Seemed PRODable to me, but yeah.

Delete, fails to meet notability guidelines. C_(u)w_(t)C_(c) 21:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can't prod something that's been at AFD before. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Ah, I was mislead by the VFD as opposed to the AFD, my apologies! C_(u)w_(t)C_(c) 02:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:34, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 03:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not finding any reliable sources that would help establish this site as being notable. Thus is fails the notability guidelines of WP:WEB. Rorshacma (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm forced to agree - it might be useful and important, but there's no evidence of that importance that would show notability under our rules. Bring me sources if I've missed them - or if they become available. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.