Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhuu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 04:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhuu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article seemingly describes a Vaishnavi term but which contains no secondary citations or really any context. There is no mention of Bhumi (the earth goddess) nor the Garuda Purana (which describes Bhu as one of the three forms of Lakshmi in Vaishnavi tradition. If I was going to set out to learn about the concept of the Bhu-mandala, I would most likely not find this article particularly helpful in that pursuit. Basically, the article is without any clear scope or notability.–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, due to lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are specialized fringe topics sites and only have passing mentions of the word. Online search also did not give anything significant to merit an article. --Venkat TL (talk) 06:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.