Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between Screens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator

Between Screens

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the notability criteria for albums. Was declined at articles for creation but then moved into mainspace anyway by the article's creator without addressing the reason for the decline. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nomination - Thank you Lunarlake for finding those sources and improving the article. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Wax Girl. No notable coverage found, not even AllMusic.Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inclined to keep based on recent improvement.~~Move as suggested~~ - My searches found no significant and considerable coverage to suggest notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Wax Girl. Not notable as a stand-alone article.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article is about a notable album by a notable Canadian artist. CubicleMilford (talk) 05:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But it seems there's no good coverage about this album, in that case, it can simply be moved to The Wax Girl. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've done some work to improve the article, as well as its references. I agree that the album is notable. Lunarlake (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ONUnicorn, Dennisthemonkeychild, and Kudpung: Please note the article has been improved. SwisterTwister talk 07:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notability demonstrated. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on page improvements. Nice finds btw, when I looked I couldn't find a thing. Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.