Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betterment.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 05:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Betterment.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not Notable. Dontforgetthisone (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Some indepth coverage in national and regional sources
1. Betterment.com brings index funds to the masses Los Angeles Times [1]
2. Betterment Strives For Better Investing International Business Times [2] causa sui (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note. This discussion was not listed on a daily log page, I have now relisted it. ascidian | talk-to-me 19:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ascidian | talk-to-me 19:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.