Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellyitch Blog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bellyitch Blog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Debatable notability of the creator as presented in the 'Media influence' section, but I don't believe the blog itself passes WP:N, particularly WP:NWEB. Sam Walton (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article seems largely a backdoor biography rather than about the website itself, of which I see no notability in any of the sources. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 17:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment - I removed the biographical info that doesn't belong, and I'm on the fence about the notability. If the sources are valid, keep. Deunanknute (talk) 22:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete - changed based on no new evidence of notability Deunanknute (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.