Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behavioral analysis of markets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioral analysis of markets

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources and I was unable to find any reputable sources for the model. It was likely created by the person marketing it as a sevice (User:Baminvestor, see baminvestor.com and @BAMInvestor on Twitter). Thomas Auge (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article contents are original research serving the ends of a commercial entity so would qualify for deletion per WP:TNT and I have found nothing that would qualify as a reliable source for the topic, so it fails notability. 'Behavioral Analysis of Markets' is a think tank founded by the person whose ideas are documented in this article [1], which is a proprietary approach to applying behavioural finance to investment strategies. I've glanced at the @BAMInvestor Twitter account and the topmost tweets are simply awful - no analysis, just psychological trickery to fool the gullible. — Charles Stewart (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure promotional unsourced WP:OR and WP:ADMASQ. Suggest salting if re-created. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.