Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaver Buzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Should have dug deeper. My mistake. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 09:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beaver Buzz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm amazed this managed to survive as long as it did. Cannot find any indication that this is any more than a small-time operation. Primefac (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are multiple resources about this energy drink in internet. It is sold in some shops. Why not? Maybe it should be expaned, updated or improved in someway, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 17:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found one source so far, I may look for more later. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Also more independent coverage, although unclear if that can be worked into the article (The Link, Montreal) Dl2000 (talk) 23:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article had several reliable secondary sources until a WP:COI wiped those out. The misguided and counterproductive COI attempts at "improving" the article should admittedly have been dealt with earlier. While the product's heyday seems to have passed, there are probably more refs out there than those listed to support a notable presence. Dl2000 (talk) 21:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.