Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beating up
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball Keep . NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 13:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Beating up (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- It's an irretrievable mess, and WP is not a dictionary anyway. Prince of Canada t | c 12:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This article has 30 incoming links. Beating-up is unfortunately but significantly a fact-of-life nowadays, and so it should have an article. I have deleted a how-to section that someone inserted recently. If you think that it needs tidying, tidy it. There is more to this article than a dictdef. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Meh. Delete- nominator. Prince of Canada t | c 12:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]- This article has stood since 09:37, 19 October 2006. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? Schuym1 (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WW2 pilots would, I believe, refer to 'beating up' a ground target either an enemy one or (as a mock attack) a friendly one. I don't see this usage mentioned at all. But I don't see that it justifies an article either. MadScot (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too much meandering dictionary material and OR. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No salvageable content beyond the WP:DICTDEF. The topic is covered in the article on violence. VG ☎ 18:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as one should noy try to write coherent articles when beaten up. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Dictionary definition. brianlucas (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT I have turned it into a disambiguation page. Please renew your comments
- Keep now that it's a disambig page BMW(drive) 19:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A perfectly respectable disambiguation page with a bunch of incoming links. JASpencer (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as disambig. Prince of Canada t | c 20:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Close Good job with the disambig. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Who would have thought one could actually make a silk purse from out of a sow's ear. Added "verbal assault" and addition "See Also" directing to disambiguation page for Beating. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: A good disambiguation page. Schuym1 (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.