Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basick Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WIKIPEDIA, YOU SET OF TOTAL DOUCHE BAGS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.118.43 (talk) 12:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Basick Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested ProD, non-notable record label. Significant number of references at first glance, but closer inspection shows that they're all either reprints of press releases, or are non-third party sources. Several of the references she added were automatically flagged as spam and removed by a bot. The majority of the bands they represent are red-linked, the few that do have articles appear to have very questionable notability. Fails the alternative criteria in WP:MUSIC, fails the general notability guideline. Author seems to have no edits outside Basick records and the bands they represent. 2 says you, says two 21:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Caravan train (talk) 18:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.