Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldi's Basics Plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baldi's Basics Plus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PROD'd this article earlier, but it was contested by someone without an explanation. Copying my rationale for deletion from the PROD: "Virtually no evidence of notability found on WP:VGSE." letcreate123 (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. letcreate123 (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete sequel to non-notable game that hasn’t even been released yet. Dronebogus (talk) 03:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it has not even been released.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Let's see how well it does after it gets released, then reconsider then. Félix An (talk) 00:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not a very good rationale to keep this article. It’s a sequel to a game that was declared non-notable, and the page could easily be recreated with better info if for some reason it actually DID turn out to be notable. Wikipedia doesn’t usually need articles for upcoming works unless they’re from a notable creator or franchise. The description of the original as “acclaimed” also makes the article seem like a promo piece. Dronebogus (talk) 00:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject fails WP:GNG fot the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Couldn't find anything about this at all. Simply WP:TOOSOON as the game is in early access right now. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.