Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BagItToday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BagItToday

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BagItToday appears to be a run of the mill e-business.

The sole reference is from a website that appears to dedicated to promoting e-businesses, quite possibly hosting media releases; in my opinion, this website is nowhere near a reliable source.

This article fails WP:CORPDEPTH as well as WP:GNG and numbers of other policies and guidelines Shirt58 (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just because Axel Springer has invested here does not make the company WP:Notable. The fellow has his money spread all over the world. Wait until we get some actual, real news about this outfit. https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=%22BagItToday%22&FORM=HDRSC6. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.