Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Panda Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Panda Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I axed this after reviewing the csd-g11 request tag on the page, but it got recreated. Being that I lean toward inclusionism, I am giving the reborn page the benefit of a doubt. We are gathered here to determine if this article should remain on Wikipedia. I cite advertisement and non-notability of the material as grounds for this afd. Note that the article's creator, Bad Panda, has been listed at usernames for admin attention since his name the article's name are near identical; if anyone here should notice a new user commenting on this afd please check to see if the person is in fact a renamed Bad Panda. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources, possible plagarism, WP:COI issues...the list goes on. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 05:30, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article. I would have been happy with speedy deletion, but am willing to defer to TomStar81's decision to have a discussion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - obvious promo for obviously non-notable "label". --Orange Mike | Talk 02:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete promo for non notable website, one of the paragraphs is just a huge quote from PR material, creator COI issues, does not establish notability. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 01:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.