Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Luck 13 Riot Extravaganza
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Lenticel (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bad Luck 13 Riot Extravaganza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Seemingly non-notable band. Prod removed by creator without comment. tomasz. 13:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable.Russian Textiles (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. They are very known in hardcore music, also they are mentioned in a band article that a member was a part of and on the hellfest article. sorry i didn't comment before nosawa. 16:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You need sources to prove how well known they are; also being known in hardcore might still not equate to being notable on the whole. Also the link in the Hellfest article is just a line-up list. tomasz. 17:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It lacks sources to verify its notability, so it probably should be deleted unless they can be found. Do U(knome)? yes...|or no 20:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:MUSIC and nontrivial coverage by reliable sources is lacking. Most of the releases seem self-published. B.Wind (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.