Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back box saver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Back box saver

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot see how this widget is notable. TheLongTone (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do we need to change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert1314 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to find significant, independent coverage in multiple WP:Reliable sources. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This appears to be quite the niche product. Not notable. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 08:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.