Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Zhao
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under CSD criterion A7. No notability, unsourced, no further scope of which to develop. Rudget 17:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- B Zhao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Probable hoax. Can't find any sources, that aren't mirrors, to back up any of the information which is currently sourced by a single blog. Onorem♠Dil 13:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no notability asserted, few ghits (except for this article or mirrors of it) - I think it may well be a hoax. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 13:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unable to find notability Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. SunCreator (talk) 13:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Bubba73 (talk), 13:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 14:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lack of notability, as stated by others above. Bubba73 (talk), 15:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And the creator of the article has been banned for vandalism, so it is a probable hoax. Bubba73 (talk), 15:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:V. The only possible claim to notability, a purported match against Kasparov lacks adequate sourcing, and even if it was true, a fairly weak opponent (even a computer) hardly inherits any notability just from playing the World Champion. (Although most players who get to play against World Champions one-on-one are notable by virtue of being grandmasters or of similar strength.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I admit I have a hard time to choose between "complete hoax" and "pure vanity", but in both cases the decision is clear. SyG (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.