Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMB LU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by TomStar81 (talk · contribs). Cunard (talk) 09:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BMB LU

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable college organization (not to mention hoax) that is a possible repost of this article. A lot of weasel wording with nothing to back it up (Googling for "Banya Mu Beta" resulted in a whopping two hits: a deleted Wikipedia article and its redirect). And of the seven references, one is the Myspace page of one of the supposed members and the rest are just random links that aren't even about the club. This just escapes the realm of CSD, but I think I'll be pulling out my galoshes before the week is over. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can edit this article to make it more appropriate in order to avoid deletion. Let me know. Skitole7 (talk) 07:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is this where I respond? It is a real club that is gaining prominence. I'm working on more sources. The University club documents are physical, not digital. Skitole7 (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete – as a non-notable organization. I have added a CSD to the page. ttonyb (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:30, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy and salt. I don't quite see the near miss. It's recreated deleted content, a hoax, and potentially "stuff made up in school." I would say G3 or A7, get rid of it, and salt the page. Also, have someone check for socks on the authors of those two pages. MSJapan (talk) 07:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what???? dont salt it. whatever you do, dont salt it. Skitole7 (talk) 07:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just to put the whole thing over the top, I would also note that the tone of the article is inappropriate, the article is internally inconsistent in what it states, all the sources are fake, and the author apparently would rather pretend this is Uncyclopedia then be a productive editor. I've requested group salting of the pages and an indef block for the user at ANI. MSJapan (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy saline injection and delete - This needs to go. Tone wrong, hoax, and fails WP:N. A delete and a creation protection move would be fitting. Rory ^{What did I do wrong?} 07:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The only reason I didn't suggest salting is because I didn't actually see the deleted articles (plus, they all had different names). Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.