Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDCricTime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BDCricTime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:ORG. No in depth coverage. Mar11 (talk) 15:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is promotional. The independent coverage in current sources is minor coverage of business deal. The remainder is self-sourced. Searches found nothing helpful to notability. Gab4gab (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't see anything to suggest notability to meet WP:WEBCRIT Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG.Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.