Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBC
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. April Fools has ended (non-admin closure) -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- BBC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organisation - cannot be CSD'd though ↅ𝜞 (Contact me) (See my edits) 00:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CNN#CNN, from my research, they seem to be a subsidiary of the same company. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. None of this is funny. In fact, if I see one more unfunny April Fool's AFD, I'm taking all of the unfunny April Fool's XFDs made in 2017 to MFD. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, you must be great fun at parties. </sarcasm> MorphinBrony (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- @MorphinBrony: Fixed your sarcasm bracket! DiamondMiner7OnWHEELz!april fools!ProDuct0339 07:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, you must be great fun at parties. </sarcasm> MorphinBrony (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Donald Trump. Olidog (talk) 10:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - otherwise we'll have to watch ITV, and that's crap. 2A02:C7D:15A:AB00:7CC3:63E:C8BC:D62B (talk) 11:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- @2A02:C7D:15A:AB00:7CC3:63E:C8BC:D62B: fixed your dots! DiamondMiner7OnWHEELz!april fools!ProDuct0339 12:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Channel 4. –Davey2010Talk 14:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to These articles which take up so much of PCR's time. Or userfy to PaddingtonBear. And Nom clearly hasn't read HTGSDTYWDWAFAITMYLG L3X1 (distant write) 16:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.