Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B&M megashifter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B&M megashifter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found a bunch of trivial mentions, but they don't show notability for this product. SL93 (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If it was just "megashifter", I'd suggest redirecting it to gear stick. What makes this different is that this article is about a specific name-brand product put out by a company that just doesn't seem to pass WP:CORP. (Otherwise I'd suggest redirecting it to the company.) I did a search but none of the sources that came back would be considered reliable. Popularity does not guarantee notability, after all. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Obvious delete - It's a nonnotable product. Shadowjams (talk) 05:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't imagine this product is notable enough to have its own article. JIP | Talk 07:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.