Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avner Strauss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Avner Strauss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject claims to be "renowned" but all relevant web hits appear to be self-published. Unable to find multiple third-party reliable sources to indicate notability. Article appears to be written by subject. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. Appears to meet the slim standards of WP:MUSIC; recognized by Israeli media.[1] THF (talk) 18:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, documented by Mooma, the most important encyclopedia of Israeli music. Released two albums through Hed Arzi and one album through Phonokol - both of them are major mainstream labels in Israel. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Cleanup. I found sources, 11 articles, all in the Jerusalem Post: [2] I would prefer sources from more than just a single media outlet, but given the fact that (a) those articles cover him in some detail, and (b) they span a broad time span, from 1989-2005, I would say this person ought to be included. I am also finding a few tangential sources that lend credibility to some of the statements. For example, this photograph attributed to him: [3] seems to resonate with his statements about being interested in whistles. That said, material that is solely referenced in self-published sources, and un-backed-up POV language like "renowned" needs to be removed. Cazort (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.