Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AutoAnything
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- AutoAnything (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any significant discussion about this web business in reliable sources independent of the company itself. All I can find is press releases and passing mentions, which do not count towards asserting notability. This page has been speedied five times in the past so I would suggest salting if the consensus here is to delete. ThemFromSpace 09:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, unambiguous advertising. Even if this is a notable business, it would be better to scrub this text and start over: one of the largest and fastest growing online retailers of custom automotive accessories and performance parts. Family owned and operated, AutoAnything has been in the automotive industry for over 30 years. Their business model is primarily B2C, with focus on the car, truck and SUV markets. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt. Highly promotional; no affirmation of notability. The list of references shows nothing but press releases, and Google News doesn't seem to have anything of value. See [1]. — Rankiri (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no indication of notability. All the significant coverage of the business appears to be press releases which do not establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 02:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.