Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August Albo (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Firm consensus that, at least under modern notability interpretations, it doesn't meet requirements. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August Albo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail. There were two previous AfDs: the first used some very bad arguments to keep, and the second had fairly weak participation. The Estonian Wiki sources do not use sources for much beyond birth and death dates. This English wiki article is not even sure of his date of death or real name. We determine notability by published sources, of which there are not enough to establish his notability, let alone real name or date of death. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article lacks multiple reliable sources needed to establish notability. With people claiming to have commissioned him to do work 20 or more years after he according to other sources died there is a mystery here that is the type that shows how lacking the sources are.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I flagged this article for notability two years ago, and given that it hasn't improved over that time, I support deleting, as it doesn't meet GNG or NARTIST --Theredproject (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. In 2006, during the first AfD, we excused a lot of crap. I didn't participate in either. There's just not enough sourcing available. Bearian (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.