Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auditcube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I agree the article in its final form was not a speedy candidate, but the lack of independent sources is fatal. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auditcube

This was tagged, correctly, as a G11 candidate by Ecoleetage (talk · contribs) but has since been cleaned up and reworded so it's vaguely encyclopedically phrased and just about claims notability. Nevertheless, I still have severe doubts about this product's actual notability - I cannot find any reliable-source coverage, so it would appear to fail WP:V and WP:N. It was also created by a user that shares a name with the product, suggesting a WP:COI. ~ mazca ^t|c 13:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Blatant spam, created by the company that is offering the product. A Google News search produces nothing: [1] and [2]. Fails WP:RS. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is does not violate G11. --Fixman^{Praise me} 15:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As I said in the nomination, its current state does not violate WP:CSD#G11, which is why I have brought it to AfD. I do believe, as I again said in the nomination, that it fails other important policies such as WP:V and WP:N. Avoiding the 'blatant spam' speedy deletion criterion doesn't make an article OK to include overall. ~ mazca ^t|c 17:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - the article's author, User:Auditcube, was reported to WP:UAA and indefinitely blocked. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only recieves 227 results when I do a Google search for it... YOWUZA TALK 2 ME! 16:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No suggestion of notability. No references. If someone wants to keep it they are welcome to address these issues. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.