Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astroscope
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of The Transformers characters. Content can be merged individually — Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Astroscope (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional character. Claritas § 17:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect To List of The Transformers characters. Not notable enough for a standalone article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran talk to me! 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge / Redirect as per above; plausible search term. I'm not seeing evidence that this character meets WP:GNG or otherwise warrants an individual article. Gong show 18:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/redirect: no reliable third party sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to character list. No reason exists to delete before merging, since the only issue is notability, and the history should be preserved in the off chance someone wants to try and restart a standalone article. Jclemens (talk) 08:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.