Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial intelligence art

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was downgrading artistic AIs to run on Intel Pentium II processor. (non-admin closure) AlphaBeta135talk 13:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial intelligence art (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It uses lots of and lots of copyrighted artwork beyond the limits of fair use. Also, per WP:AI, we should not be encouraging Wikipedians to start primarily uploading and using images that are generated by artificial intelligence. It'll put all of the artists and photographers who have honed their craft, including the ones who can draw Sonic the Hedgehog characters accurately, like me, unlike AI, out of work. This is all obviously bad for both Wikipedia and the society it rules.[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It'll put all of the artists and photographers who have honed their craft - if you establish in the rest of the sentence that human artists are better than AI, how is that possible? Anyway, keep per WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS * Pppery * it has begun... 00:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Put infinite monkeys on infinite typewriters instead. They'll fare out better. 💜  melecie  talk - 09:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.