Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtLib.cz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArtLib.cz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed as part of New Page Patrol. This organization aiming to improve art coverage on Wikipedia appears to fail WP:NORG, with zero independent sources; the sources in the article are from Czech Wikipedia, Commons, and the Wikimedia Foundation blog. The organization has notable members and has worked with notable institutions, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. I was unable to find sources to satisfy WP:GNG by searching for "ArtLib.cz" or "WikiProjekt Knihovna umění". There is this article - from what I can tell using Google Translate, the website appears to be fairly reliable (has staff writers and is funded by the Czech government) - however, the article reads like a press release. This appears to be a reprint of the same press release. Perhaps Czech speakers will be able to find more sources, but at the moment I'm not convinced the organization is notable. Spicy (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this appears to be promotion of an activity (Wikipedia editing!). A search does not turn up WP:SIGCOV, so it is a GNG fail.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence that this is notable enough. Java Hurricane 08:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When I thought it was simply a misplaced English version of a wikiproject page. I made a note on the talk page. The project doesn't seem to exist on enwp, so perhaps it can be established? Perhaps notify the participants that are active on enwp? Vexations (talk) 11:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication of significant coverage. possibly put in the Wikipedia: namespace? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the organization. Article looks WP:PROMOTIONAL. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.