Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apps4Brands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apps4Brands

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable social media websites, only claimed to be founded this year - contested PROD -- Boing! said Zebedee 23:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no notability whatsoever. Glenfarclas (talk) 23:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the Original PRODder of the article. It is in no way notable; I have searched for sources to no avail. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 00:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Klhtq5 (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC) This is a new social media site so it does not have a lot of publicity, but it is an actual company. The website is currently going through construction. Please do not delete! It would probably cause my professor to fail me in my capstone class, which I need to pass in order to graduate. IF you go to CloveApp.com, Magnify.net, or Involver.com you will see that this is a legitimate page.[reply]

Hi. Nobody is claiming that the company and the sites do not exist - just that they are not notable in accordance with Wikipedia's policies, which require references from multiple independent sources - see WP:N and WP:RS. If such third-party coverage does not yet exist, then the company does not yet qualify for an article - but when it does, it will -- Boing! said Zebedee 10:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, spam/db-web. Hairhorn (talk) 04:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising and patent nonsense: Engaging their customers, prospects, employees and other influencers on social networks, attaining attention of influencers through Earned Media, automating the process to lower the cost of investment in new employees and custom solutions and maintaining consistent branding and voice on multiple earned media platforms. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Existence is insufficient justification for an article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.