Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anvil3d
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - brenneman 00:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anvil3d (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Although the creator never removed the prod tag on this article, a comment on its talk page is to be regarded as a contestation of the prod. Game engine with no assertion of notability. (There are also COI issues, but I would disregard them here.) Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't come up with any useful reliable sources to verify this game engine. Gary King (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find anything either. SharkD (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete It's only in the ALPHA stage - so therefore doesn't fit the notability criteria. ArcAngel (talk) 00:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, notability is determined by coverage in reliable sources. Gary King (talk) 00:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet inclusion guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Edits made by the creator after the opening of this AfD are definitely promotional, and there is also an AfD tag removal. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment-Anvil3d is still under construction. The area under licensing has been deleted. I'm trying to take a more neutral view when writing this article. I do not see the need to delete this article. -Wdenslow
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.