Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is delete - a redirect would be inappropriate according to the final comments made on this AfD -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Time

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This science fiction concept from the final episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation really isn't notable enough for a standalone article. Appears to have been deleted before under the title Anti-time, see Deletionpedia. –Grondemar 04:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable if it only happened one time in fiction. Cool concept however.Kitfoxxe (talk) 04:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it only appears in one episode, and is not the same as other concepts of "anti-time" from Star Trek itself, nor from various theories in science or fringe science. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the article on the episode. I haven't checked but knowing WP all the info of this article is probably there already. Kitfoxxe (talk) 04:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to relevant episode. Artw (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to relevant episode article. I suppose it could be merged if there's any content here which doesn't appear there. Jclemens (talk) 01:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the finale episode. This doesn't require an AfD. --EEMIV (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't see why a redirect is a good idea. There are several non-Trek usages on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&ns0=1&redirs=0&search=antitime&limit=500&offset=0 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the term "anti-time" is too general to redirect to All Good Things.... It's too general to make a good WP:DAB page either. I'd recommend just letting the search engine handle it. –Grondemar 16:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.