Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anselm Turmeda
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's a copyvio, and even if permission was given it wouldn't be encyclopedic in it's form so I'll just delete it. If someone wants to write an original article, great. - Bobet 13:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
AfD tag was placed by User:Archibald99 but not followed up. Abstain on my part, though I would like to point out that while the subject appears to have some notability as a writer-philosopher (see Catalan entry), the text of the article is simply a copy of existing text from another web page. ... discospinster talk 19:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unencyclopedic, copied from another site. Archibald99 19:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup/total rewrite. This is a notable individual, though the current article is unworthy. --Cúchullain t/c 19:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as copyvio and rewrite Danny Lilithborne 21:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Amazing. We have an abstain, a delete, a keep, and a speedy delete as the first four contributions. Would anyone like to suggest a merge? ;-) ... discospinster talk 02:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd do it, but I voted already. :)--Cúchullain t/c 19:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Cúchullain. Amazon carries a book about Renaissance philosophers where the editor introduces him as "an extraordinary figure who straddled the worlds of Christianity and Islam". Let's tag this as a copyvio and delete the copied text. Ohconfucius 05:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.