Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous Surveillance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 01:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous Surveillance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a term recently coined by the article creator and his collaborators. There is no indication provided that this meaning of "anonymous surveillance" is widely used outside of that team's research papers. Pichpich (talk) 03:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be promoting someone's "emerging" method: a new emerging framework for video surveillance which respects the users' privacy while still providing safety and security. It is an enhancement over existing privacy protection methods that only focus on hiding faces in the video; which was found unreliable in recent research - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have added some external links. Biscuittin (talk) 19:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You haven't really added any links. You've formatted the existing links properly and those links are to that academic's research papers. I'm not disputing the existence of that work but I am challenging its importance outside his research group. Pichpich (talk) 01:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as completely non-notable academic research. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article does not establish notability. Could not establish notability with my own research. --Kvng (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.