Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjula Mutanda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anjula Mutanda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As highlighted by the hatnotes, this page clearly isn't up to Wikipedia standards in terms of style and content. I've had it bookmarked for a while to do some work on it myself, but having tried to find some references, I'm struggling to find any significant, independent sources and I'm no longer convinced that the subject has achieved sufficient notability to pass WP:ANYBIO. For this reason, I'm putting it to the community to discuss. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even remotely close to being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete needs TNT, but poorly sourced to a depracated source and the Mirror. OMG. Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 08:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a new editor has left a comment on the subject's talk page, suggesting I have an ulterior motivate for nominating the page. I've responded on their own talk page. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, PR, have deleted unsourced edits. Historically a couple of SPA's have done a lot of the editing --Devokewater 14:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. KidAd (💬💬) 01:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.