Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angolmois energy
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. When/if the list mentioned is created, feel free to ping me on my talk page to get the content restored and merged (though as there is nothing sourced to merge it might be better to simply start from scratch). T. Canens (talk) 04:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Angolmois energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing to establish notability. No sources for years, appparently. Since even energon (the fuel) got deleted, this likely stands very little chance. NotARealWord (talk) 12:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to a list of some sort. It's patently stupid that Energon is a redlink now, but this could likely go into some sort of list of energy elements in transformers, since it seems to be the focus of conflict throughout everything I've seen of the various series. Jclemens (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delte merge to what Jclemens there is no list to merge this fancruft too. Another pathetic attempt by incluionissts to hoard articles with weak notability and even weaker sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 19:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You've articulated no deletion rationale. Jclemens (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OK Jclemens there is no RELIABLE third person sources to support that this articles contents are true. The article is filled mainly with primary information. Also you suggested Merge to a list of some sort. Dwanyewest (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You've articulated no deletion rationale. Jclemens (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Create a list of Transformers elements and Merge this article to it. --Divebomb (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- very minor fictional element, no sources, no obvious merge target. Reyk YO! 06:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Create a list of Transformers fuel and merge or redirect this article to it. JIP | Talk 07:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if reliable sources cannot be found, and I sure can't find any. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.