Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Wendel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Wendel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not ascertain notability. Even if they corroborated with other personalities, notability is not inherited. - Pmedema (talk) 03:22, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 03:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Would warrant a mention in coverage of the channel but no independent notability whatsoever. KaisaL (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough evidence of notability; I'm not sure if perhaps the channel 'whatever' may have independent notability enough for an article. I definitely feel that the individual pranksters aren't notable enough though. Spiderone 11:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.