Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnandTech (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AnandTech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another one like The Next Web or YourStory. Made for Promotions by promotions alone and nothing else. Light2021 (talk) 14:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this was a super-important news site in its day, and I recall the genuine organic third-party journalism when it was eventually being sold by the founder - David Gerard (talk) 00:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not an unfair nomination I must note, the article isn't great and is a bit too much like the usual tech site article - David Gerard (talk) 09:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Important review/benchmarks website in its days, broad coverage in reliable sources. Pavlor (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article result was keep at first AFD See This — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historical Ben (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- found this mention, for example: Build It. Fix It. Own It: A Beginner's Guide to Building and Upgrading a PC by Paul McFedries, where AnandTech appears in a list alongside Ars Technica. Appears to be noted in its space. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:59, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's got pretty good coverage, such as [1] and [2] from TechCrunch. It's difficult sometimes to separate the site's coverage from that of its founder, but both have made headlines in the tech press over the years. Like the others have said, AnandTech was one of the most important and popular tech websites for a long time. Doing a Google Books search will turns up numerous books that recommend it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh. Personally I think the founder article's a prospect for merging into this one, as the notable thing he did ... - David Gerard (talk) 09:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Major technology news website with substantial original reporting which has been cited as a source by many other major publications. It used to be an Alexa 2500 website before it was sold (which is pretty good for a news site). 69.159.54.56 (talk) 06:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I see enough reliable sources to take it to the threshold of notability.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.