Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Power Systems
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. CharlieEchoTango (talk) 18:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- American Power Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pretty blatant advertising. NickCT (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been edited to remove advertising language and improve the article from Historianqc1965. - HOalternator 10:55 (CST) 8 NOV 11
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 16:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article does not offer any evidence of notability, and the generic nature of the name has meant I've had no success in finding any such evidence myself. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - of the 2 references, one is to the company itself, and the other is a bare page of GSA which gives nothing away. Unless better citations turn up, this is insufficient to prove Notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: 2 relists and no notability has been shown. SL93 (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.