Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Adolph
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 21:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- American Adolph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This fictional character made one appearance over 60 years ago and has not appeared since. Subject does not meet notability standards. Konczewski 18:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Blanchardb 19:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom 21:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. —Quasirandom 21:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per WP:FICT into List of Wonder Woman enemies (at least, what isn't already on that page). Independent notability isn't established for an article of its own, and while capturing Wonder Woman may be enviable accomplishment, notability isn't inherited. —Quasirandom 21:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect as Quasirandom suggests. - Peregrine Fisher 22:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect following Quasirandom. (Emperor 16:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- Comment: That's right, we must delete this trivial article that's only useful to a few thousand people in order to save electrons. Remember, save those electrons, they're more important than you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.148.100 (talk) 18:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, we delete trivial items that disorganize Wikipedia, making it harder to find things a bit harder. If you don't have a useful opinion on the topic at hand (or even the courtesy to sign your comment), please don't bother to post.Konczewski 19:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm afraid the user has posted the same message to dozens of AfDs so it is probably not worth wasting too much time on them. (Emperor 20:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.