Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altitude tent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 14:25, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Altitude tent

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe redirect/merge this into altitude sickness? The current state of the article is definitely not sufficient. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 13:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

altitude training might be more fitting. Oreocooke (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No reason for deletion given. Easy to find sources on GScholar about their effects. Pretty sure I remember altitude tents/hypoxic tents being discussed in mainstream news during an olympics event a while back too. Deletion is based on availability of sources, and they're definitely out there. Keep and improve per WP:PRESERVE. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 03:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AFD is NOTCLEANUP. Sources from Google and Scholar establish notability: [1] [2] [3]. Both "altitude tent" and "hypoxic tent" produce several hits. Anerdw (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:11, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the only reason given for deletion is WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Brightonheritage (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.