Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the merge discussion that was initiated at this article's talk page, there appears to be some consensus within the discussion to nominate the article for deletion. Taking this to AfD to gain a wider discussion. The rationale for deletion can be seen on the talk page, but essentially, these alternate universes are not a major part of the source material involved, and the article lacks secondary sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no third-party surces or any secondary info. clearly not notable or worthy by any means. Lucia Black (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I realize I may induce groans by saying this, as I was the one who first proposed it be merged, but I wonder if these universes are covered by reviews or other secondary coverage we just haven't looked at yet. Tezero (talk) 16:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've perused the sources linked in Reception, and I didn't notice a single mention of the alternate universes. I could see articles on Piro and Largo, but since the reviewers didn't think to mention this feature of the comic, it doesn't satisfy WP:N to keep an entire article on it. Tezero (talk) 18:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't believe there's an alternate universe where this article is relevant. I would have suggested a speedy deletion. -Novil Ariandis (talk) 07:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Lucia and Novil. I don't see how it's notable generally outside of its own universe. Bearian (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.