Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha-beta model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The closest thing to a consensus that has arisen in this discussion is to merge the article somewhere, perhaps to Paris' law - this can be deliberated on outside AfD. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 21:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha-beta model

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR concerns; I've been unable to find other coverage, and all the references are to papers by Baptista and Adib. The article could use a rename even if kept - there are many alpha-beta models. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/merge This is similar to Titanium adhesive bonding – a narrow technical account of some aspect of titanium material science. This seems to be a student assignment and so is quite unlikely to be OR. What it needs is more context and wikification. To understand the apha/beta aspect, see titanium alloy and sources such as this. To understand our policies on such pages, see WP:ATD; WP:BITE; WP:IMPERFECT; WP:NOTPAPER; WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the papers are written by a small group of people, with two names that are common to each, apart from one entry. That is the very definition of WP:OR. It is not verifiable. Perhaps in 5 years when it is well known, but not at the moment. I can't find anything on it either. There way to verify it. scope_creep^Talk 18:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rollidan (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Needs to prove notability with reliable, third-party sources. --Darth Mike^(talk) 18:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to Paris' law, where it can be briefly treated as a generalization. XOR'easter (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to Paris' law.4meter4 (talk) 14:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.