Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allthing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allthing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While it could be merged or redirected, I see nothing in this article that belongs in an encyclopedia. See a similar AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allies of Camlach D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No sourced content = no article and no merge. Then redirect to Althing as a plausible mis-spelling. Reyk _YO! 05:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 05:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Reyk, Sadads (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if deleted, it should be redirected to Althing. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kushiel's Legacy. Someone's bound to search for it so it meets WP:R#KEEP Criteria 5.--hkr (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment what about the real life usage, as an alternate spelling of althing? 76.66.203.138 (talk) 05:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, then create a redirect to Althing, per Reyk. Deor (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.