Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance Global Services

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable consulting company. No independent references are provided in the article, and all I could find in a News Archive search was press releases. MelanieN (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Here's one source that provides WP:SIGCOV: [1]. Other sources found thus far are only providing passing mentions, e.g. [2], [3] (in Spanish). If additional sources are found, please ping me at my talk page. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Aside from the InformationWeek article identified by User:Northamerica1000, which is effectively content from the firm, all I have found is some routine business announcements. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.