Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All the Filth!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Given that all of the band's albums are up for deletion, here & here, and there's been minimal input, the best thing to do is combine the information into the main article, Pork Dukes. — Scientizzle 16:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All the Filth!

non-notable release, 391 hits in Google Rapido (talk) 17:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:A. Rapido (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I googled for "All the filth!" CD and got 5,600 hits. Either way, low g-hits may only indicate that it's a niche market item, which seems to be the case here. My understanding is that the group was a medium-level part of the first Brit punk invasion and that this compilation is significant for being a reasonable retrospective of their contribution to the genre. Yeah, I'm an inclusionist. Matt Deres (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - My original statistic is for "All the filth!" "the Pork Dukes"; as it's unlikely that the artist would not be referenced in the same page as a mention of the record. Most other pages are presumably where the words "all the filth" appear in a sentence. Not sure how just because an artist is notable, that all their artwork can be considered notable by default. The Pork Dukes themselves seem only on the threshold of notability (personally I have been involved in the British music scene myself and had never heard of them before reading their entry, they seem more of a local band). Rapido (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The notability of the band seems to be well-established, despite your never hearing about them before, and therefore so too are their official releases. This disc in particular seems to be a notable release from this group. Jlivy (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)— Jlivy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete per nom. -RiverHockey (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.