Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Correa Rueda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Correa Rueda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Came across this at recent changes. Created almost two years ago and has been overwhelmingly edited by Señor Correa himself since then. It does not seem to me that the references and sources establish notability within the field, and I couldn't really find anything else save mirrors of this page and his other online profiles. Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems to be a non-notable academic, I can find no evidence of him meeting the WP:GNG or WP:PROF notability criteria. The article reads more like a resume or CV! Sionk (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google web, news, and books searches show that he's done some good things, but certainly nothing to make him notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia such as this. I agree that the page reads like a resume or CV. Looks like WP:SPIP. MisterRichValentine ^(talk) 20:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only a handful of citations, no GN or GB hits (other than WP-derived books), nothing in article indicating WP:PROF is met. -- 202.124.74.170 (talk) 09:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with the above... Could not find anything notable either... Tradedia (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - autobiography of non-notable consultant who has a sock account Alejandro Correa he used to edit this account last year. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet any applicable guideline. (Mike, I think you're a bit too harsh about the socking, that one account only has 3 edits, all to this article, and seems a case of inadvertently creating a new account; all other edits before and after were made under his complete name). --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- - Mehhhh... you may be right; but how does one accidentally create a whole new account? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's true, too. But as there was no attempt to hide his identity, I just assume there was some kind of error involved rather than bad faith. Note that he has solicited the aide of some other editors (who have not reacted yet to his requests) to save "his" article, stating "I want to contribute to Wikipedia". Given that basically his only edits are to his autobio... --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.